Protection and Legal Liability of Electronic Medical Records in Primary Clinics from the Perspective of Legal Certainty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i12.127Keywords:
Legal Certainty, Electronic Medical Record, Pratama ClinicAbstract
One of the functions of Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice is the regulation of medical records. Along with the changing times, medical records have also developed into electronic medical records. Electronic medical records become a record of the patient's health during his life so that a need for protection and legal liability of electronic medical records at Pratama clinics. This study aims to analyze the law on the protection and legal liability of electronic medical records at Pratama clinics in terms of legal certainty perspective. This research uses normative empirical with a juridical normative research approach. Meanwhile, the research analysis is quantitative analysis. The results showed that medical records are regulated in Article 47 of the 2004 law on medical practice. Along with the development of technology comes Electronic Medical Records (RME) where documentation of patient medical records throughout life in electronic form. The implementation of electronic medical records in this Pratama clinic can provide better legal certainty for all parties involved in the health care process.
References
Atac, A., Kurt, E., & Yurdakul, S. E. (2013). An overview to ethical problems in telemedicine technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 116–121.
Clark, P. A., Capuzzi, K., & Harrison, J. (2010). Telemedicine: medical, legal and ethical perspectives. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 16(12), RA261-72.
Doherty, R. F. (2020). Ethical dimensions in the health professions-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Euchner, J. (2016). The medium is the message. In Research-Technology Management (Vol. 59, Issue 5, pp. 9–11). Taylor & Francis.
Fabbrocini, G., De Vita, V., Pastore, F., D’Arco, V., Mazzella, C., Annunziata, M. C., Cacciapuoti, S., Mauriello, M. C., & Monfrecola, A. (2011). Teledermatology: from prevention to diagnosis of nonmelanoma and melanoma skin cancer. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, 2011, 1–5.
Frishman, W. H. (2018). House Calls. The American Journal of Medicine, 131(8), 861–862.
Ganiem, L. M. (2021). Efek Telemedicine Pada Masyarakat (Kajian Hukum Media McLuhan: Tetrad). Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 9(2), 87–97.
Kolib, A. (2020a). Analisis Yuridis Perbandingan Risiko Medis dengan Kelalaian Medis. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 2(2), 238–254.
Kolib, A. (2020b). The patient’s right to the medical record of a therapeutic agreement In a human rights perspective. Jurnal Profesi Medika: Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan, 14(1).
Kolib, A. (2021). PROFESIONALITAS DOKTER DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA. Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis (Selisik), 7(1), 39–48.
Marzuki, M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.
Novianto, W. T. (2015). PENAFSIRAN HUKUM DALAM MENENTUKAN UNSUR-UNSUR KELALAIAN MALPRAKTEK MEDIK (MEDICAL MALPRACTICE. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 488–503.
Pontoh, M. R. (2013). Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Resiko Medik dan Malpraktek Dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Dokter. Lex Crimen, 2(7).
Siahaan, A. P. U., & Aryza, S. (2018). Crime Aspect of Telemedicine on Health Technology.
Statistik., B. P. (2022). Jumlah Penduduk Indonesia per 1 Juli 2022. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Tuckson, R. V, Edmunds, M., & Hodgkins, M. L. (2017). Telehealth. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(16), 1585–1592.
WHO. (2010). Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: report on the second global survey on eHealth. Geneva PP - Geneva: World Health Organization.
Worldometer. (2023, February 8). World population by country. Retrieved from https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/
Fatimah, U. D. (2017). Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Rekam Medis dalam Pengembangan Alat Bukti untuk Mendapatkan Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum. JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal), 18(2), 214-249.
Hanifah, I. (2020). Kebijakan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Rumah Tangga Melalui Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(2), 193-208.
Hendrawan, D., et al. (2021). Pelayanan Primer yang Berkualitas: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. 1(1), 1-14.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 Tentang Rekam Medis. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2022 Nomor 4. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.
Kementerian Kesehatan (Kemenkes). (2023). Tentang UPK. https://upk.kemkes.go.id/new/profil/tentang-upk. Diakses pada 28 September 2023.
Khasanah, M. (2020). Tantangan Penerapan Rekam Medis Elektronik Untuk Instansi Kesehatan. Jurnal Sainstech, 7(2), 50-53.
Kurniawan, A., & Setiawan, A. (2021). Perlindungan Data Rekam Medis Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Data Pribadi Pasien Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi. 9(1), 95-112.
Mangentang, F. (2015). Kelengkapan Resume Medis dan Kesesuaian Penulisan Diagnosis Berdasarkan ICD-10 Sebelum dan Sesudah JKN di RSU Bahteramas. Jurnal ARSI. 1(3), 159-168.
Marif, M., Nurhaedah, N., & Bakhtiar, H. S. (2021). The principles of good governance in health services. Jambura Law Review, 3(2), 295-318.
Nurfitria, B., et al. (2022). Literature Review: Implementasi Rekam Medis Elektronik di Institusi Pelayanan Kesehatan di Indonesia. Research Gate.
Suwignjo, A. H. (2019). Tinjauan Hukum Pembukaan Rekam Medik Dari Sudut Pandang Asuransi Kesehatan. Spektrum Hukum, 16(1), 1-36.
Sylvia Anjani, S. K. M., & Maulana Tomy Abiyasa, A. (2023). Disrupsi Digital dan Masa Depan Rekam Medis (Kajian Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 Tentang Rekam Medis Elektronik). Selat Media.
Ulumiyah, N. (2018). Meningkatkan Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan Dengan Penerapan Upaya Keselamatan Pasien Di Puskesmas. Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia. 6(2), 149-155.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Novianti Novianti, Abdul Kolib
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
