Analysis of the Legitimacy of the State of Emergency in Forming Perppu Number 2 of 2022 Concerning Job Creation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i09.59Keywords:
Legitimacy, State of Emergency, Perppu Number 2 of 2022Abstract
This study aims to analyze the establishment of Perppu number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation. Is the establishment of a work copyright law by the president of the Republic of Indonesia as the head of government something objective. Therefore, in this paper, a maximum of two problem formulations are conceptualized, namely 1) Benchmarks of Compelling Crucial Issues as a runway in forming Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws, and 2) Analysis of Legal Implications of Perppu Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation. Starting from these problems, this paper uses normative legal research with various literature such as books, journals, and statutory regulations (Statute Approach) and also uses a historical approach (Historical Approach) and a comparative approach (Comparative Approach) as a knife. analysis that the making of Perppu number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation is a policy that is very inconsistent with the needs that exist in society in Indonesia. From this conception two major findings can be found 1) Knowing the benchmarks in forming a Government Regulation in lieu of Law in accordance with the Constitutional Court Decision number 138/PUU/-VII/2009 is in line with supported theories and dogmas so as to realize findings based on a coherent and systematic concept, and 2) Knowing whether the formation of Perppu number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation is an effective regulation, so that effectiveness brings a black shadow in the formation of Perppu number 2 of 2022 so that the legal implications that the author analyzes are the formation Perppu number 2 of 2022 concerning work copyright is a Constitutional Disobedience regulation and is not in accordance with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 138/PUU-VII/2009 Regarding Emergency Conditions.
References
Amalia, Z. (2020). Pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja dalam Perspektif Demokrasi. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2(3), 21–30.
Aslansyah, M., Umar, F., n.d. STUDI AJARAN HANS KELSEN TENTANG PURE THEORY OF LAW DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN.
Asshiddiqqie, J. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid II. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta.
Bima, M. R. (2019). Hal Ikhwal Kegentingan Yang Memaksa Sebagai Landasan Pembentukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(1), 97–106.
Djanggih, H., & Ahmad, K. (2017). The Effectiveness of Indonesian National Police Function on Banggai Regency Police Investigation (Investigation Case Study Year 2008-2016). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 17(2), 152–157.
Hidayat, A. (2021). Critical Review Buku “Penelitian Hukum” Peter Mahmud Marzuki Penelitian Hukum Ad Quemtentang Norma. YUSTISIA MERDEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 7(2), 117–125.
Hsb, A. M. (2019). Kegentingan yang Memaksa dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang.
Huda, N. (2010). Pengujian Perppu oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(5), 73–92.
Muhtadi, M. (2014). Penerapan Teori Hans Kelsen Dalam Tertib Hukum Indonesia. FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5 (3).
Nuh, M. S. N. S. (2011). Hakekat Keadaan Darurat Negara (State Of Emergency) sebagai Dasar Pembentukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 18(2), 229–246.
Safa’at, M. A. (2010). Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Checks and Balances. TRANS Publising, Malang.
Sofyani, H., Ali, U. N. N. A., & Septiari, D. (2020). Implementasi Prinsip-Prinsip Tata Kelola yang Baik dan Perannya terhadap Kinerja di Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes). JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi), 5(2), 325–359.
Voegelin, E. H. (1945). GENERAL THEORY OF LAW AND STATE, by Hans Kelsen, translated by Anders Wedberg (20th Century Legal Philosophy Series: Volume I), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1945. Pp. xxxiii, 516. $6.00.; THE PURE THEORY OF LAW, by William Ebenstein. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1945. Pp. xii, 211. Louisiana Law Review, 6(3), 17.
Zuraida, I. (2018). Batasan Kegentingan Yang Memaksa dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu) di Bidang Perpajakan. Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara, 1(1), 304–319.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fadil Cakra Perdana, Yogi Syahputra Alidrus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
