Reverse Evidentiary Analysis in Article 12 B Paragraph (1) A and B of Law Number 20 of 2001 Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 Concerning The Eradication of Corruption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i10.78Keywords:
Corruption, Reverse Evidence, GratificationAbstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the philosophical basis of the reverse proof system for future Gratification corruption crimes and the formulation of norms for the reverse proof system for future Gratification corruption crimes. The research method used in this study is normative juridical with qualitative descriptive data analysis techniques. The results of the study are the philosophical basis of the reverse proof system for the crime of graft corruption related to bribery Article 12 B, namely that both the public prosecutor and the defendant are obliged to prove but the public prosecutor alone proves the gift received by the recipient of the gratuity while the defendant proves that the gratuity is not a bribe, has nothing to do with position and does not conflict with their duties or obligations. The construction of legal substance, which directs the formulation of reverse evidentiary norms with an emphasis on legislative policies according to the 2003 CAC as a characteristic of the combination of the hukum umum and hukum sipil legal systems as a legal system.
References
Ibrahim. (2011). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia.
Lilik, M. (2005). Reversing the Burden of Proof. Sumatera Selatan: Sinar Grafika.
Mahfud. (2012). Pancasila dan UUD 1945 Sebagai Dasar Solusi Persoalan Bangsa. Malang: Universitas Merdeka Malang.
Mulyadi, L., & Ismail. (2016). The Shifting of Burden of Proof on Corruption Offences in Indonesia After The Ratification of United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003. The Southeast Asia Law Journal, 16-31.
Ronny. (1998). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Sadiah, S. S. (2021). Implementasi Pembuktian Terbalik Pada Kasus Korupsi di Negara Indonesia dan Malaysia. Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.
Soemarto, S. (2018). The Reconstruction of the Reversal of the Burden of Proof Verificationin Corruption Delict. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences (IJELS), 732-745.
Sumaryanto, D. (2011). Reversal of the burden of proof in taxation corruption. Journal of Justice, 49.
Zainuri. (2007). Akar Kultural Korupsi di Indonesia. Depok: Cahaya Baru Sawangan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Delvin Akbar, Ariawan Gunadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
