Criminal Justice Reform: From Due Process Model to Reintegrative Model as an Alternative to Criminal Case Resolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i10.82Keywords:
Judicial Reform, Due Process Model, Reintegrative ModelAbstract
The research problem of this study is the reform of criminal justice from the due process model to the reintegrative model as a consequence of the development of criminal law, including in the resolution of criminal cases. The reintegrative model is a process of establishing new norms or values, as a form of adaptation in the enforcement of criminal law with the approaches of restorative justice, penal mediation, and discretion. The research method used is normative legal research, with statutory, historical, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The results of this study indicate that, firstly, the reform of criminal justice from the due process model to the reintegrative model is an effort to integrate several approaches such as restorative justice, penal mediation, and discretion. This approach is introduced as an effort to minimize the dominance of the due process model. Resolving criminal cases using the due process model is not the only model for resolving criminal cases, but there are many alternatives available. The concept of the reintegrative model emerged due to the numerous issues in law enforcement with the current dominance of the due process model in criminal justice, which focuses on imprisonment as punishment. Secondly, the reintegrative model of criminal justice provides an alternative for resolving criminal cases, with several approaches that can be used and maximized, including restorative justice, penal mediation, and discretion. Restorative justice can be applied in resolving various criminal offenses, penal mediation involves resolving criminal cases outside the court through deliberation and consensus, and police discretion is a justified police action in the interest of the public. However, these approaches are not well-implemented because some still perceive that resolving criminal cases using these approaches is not part of the criminal law enforcement process
References
Amiruddin & Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2016.
Alfano Ramadhan, Diskresi Penyidik Polri Sebagai Alternatif Penanganan Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Vol. 6 No. 1, 2021.
Budi Heriyanto, Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Menggunakan Mediasi Penal Dalam Diskursus Diskresi Kepolisian, Jurnal Transparansi Hukum, Vol. 5 No. 2, 2022.
Brilian Capera, Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Paradigma Pemidanaan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Vo. 6 No. 2, 2021.
Farida Sekti Pahlevi, Revitalisasi Pancasila dalam Penegakan Hukum yang Berkeadilan di Indonesia. Justicia Islamica, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2016.
Febby Mutiara Nelson, Due Process Model Dan Restorative Justice Di Indonesia: Suatu Telaah Konseptual. Jurnal Hukum Pidana & Kriminoplogi, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2020.
Hanafi Arief & Ningrum Ambarsari, Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2, 2018.
Hajairin, Hajairin. Politik Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. deepublish, 2022.
Irwansyah, Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media, Yogyakarta, 2021.
I Made Pasek Diantha, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum, Cetakan ke-1. Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2017.
Ira Alia Maerani, Implementasi Ide Keseimbangan Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Pancasila. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol. 11 No. 2, 2015.
John Rawls, A. Theory Of Justice (Teori Keadilan) dialih bahasakan oleh (Uzair Fauz), Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2006.
J.Pajar Widodo, Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Mafia Peradilan, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1, 2012.
Johnny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia Publishing, Malang, 2006.
Lilik Mulyadi, Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Penerbit Alumni, Bandung, 2022.
Mukhlis R, Rekonstruksi Penyidikan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Berbasis pada Prinsip Negara Hukum Pancasila, Melayunesia Law, Vol 2 No 1, 2018.
Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani, Kewenangan Diskresi Kepolisian Republik Indonesia dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, Vol. 7 No. 2, 2021.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2017.
Romli Atmasasmita, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2010.
Ruben Achmad, Hakekat Keberadaan Sanksi Pidana Dan Pemidanaan Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana. Legalitas, Vol 5 No. 2, 2013.
Soejono Soekanto, Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar, Rajawali Pres, Jakarta, 2015.
Saifullah, Tipologi Penelitian Hukum: Kajian Sejarah, Paradigma dan Pemikiran Tokoh. Intelegensia Media, Malang, 2015.
Sahabuddin. Reorientasi Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Ringan (Dari Due Process Model ke Reintegrative Model). Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 14 No. 1, 2014.
Teguh Hariyono, Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Upaya Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Di Luar Pengadilan, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2021.
Teddy Lesmana, Integrasi Mediasi Penal Dalam Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Pena Persada Redaksi, Banyumas, 2020.
Tendy Septiyo, dkk, Optimalisasi Penerapan Mediasi Penal Sebagaialternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana, Jurnal Yuridis Vol. 7 No. 2, 2020.
Teddy Lesmana, Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Vol 1 No 1, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hajairin, Muhammad Mustofa, Tofik Yanuar Chandra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
