The Effects of Bankruptcy on PT Megakarya Maju Sentosa, Ciputat, South Tangerang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i09.57Keywords:
Bankruptcy, Legal Responsibility, Concurrent CreditorsAbstract
Capital, which refers to cost, is one consideration in building low-cost apartment. Because of this developer can utilize the finance provided by banks. However, financing can be gained by selling the units before the low-cost apartment is built. This is as meant by Article 42 of the Law No. 20 of 2011 on low-cost apartment building, which allows the property units to be marketed before it is built (pre-project selling). However, before conducting the sales, there are some requirements to meet. This is contained in Article 43 of the Law No. 20 of 2011 on low-cost apartment building which states that the process of sale and purchase of unit before the unit is completely built can be conducted through Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) made before a Notary. The PPJB stipulated by Paragraph 1 is executed after there are legal certainty over; a. landownership, b. ownership of building permit, c. the availability of facilities, infrastructures, and public utility, d. 20% (twenty per cent) minimally constructed, and the agreed terms. To manage the gained capital, it is necessary to correctly calculate everything in order to avoid bankruptcy. This research analyzes the effects of bankruptcy, which causes the auction on land and building. The issues discussed in this research are bankruptcy which leads to the auction of land and building assets, bankruptcy estate, and Limited Liability Company (PT)’s legal responsibility on its concurrent creditors. This research applies normative approach. The data were collected from documents or other references. They were analyzed qualitatively. The findings of this research show that the funds resulted from the auction was used to handle the auction fee, to pay both preferred and separatist creditors. Therefore, the concurrent creditors were not provided compensations as the results of the sold debtor’s assets. PT’s legal responsibility was to settle agreement only with the separatist creditors without involving concurrent creditors. Meanwhile, in building the low-cost apartment, concurrent also played great role to provide capital assistance by purchasing the unit of low-cost apartment. In fact, the settlement was only conducted with the separatist creditors. As a result, the concurrent creditors serve as the weakest party
References
Adichandra, M. B., & Setianingrum, R. B. (2021). Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Rumah dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan Pengembang. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(1), 1–20.
Asikin, Z. (2012). Pengantar Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Bachtiar, B. (2019). Metode Penelitian Hukum.
Damlah, J. (2017). Akibat Hukum Putusan Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Lex Crimen, 6(2).
Dantes, K. F. (2021a). Dampak Hukum Putusan Pailit Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Suami Istri Yang Tidak Melakukan Perjanjian Perkawinan Pisah Harta. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(3), 917–923.
Dantes, K. F. (2021b). Dampak Hukum Putusan Pailit Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Suami Istri Yang Tidak Melakukan Perjanjian Perkawinan Pisah Harta. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(3), 917–923.
Fitriadi, K. (2022). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DEBITUR DALAM KEADAAN KEPAILITAN PADA PERIKATAN UTANG PIUTANG. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 1(11), 2807–2812.
Isnaeni, D. (2021). Peran Notaris Dalam Pendirian Pt Usaha Mikro Dan Kecil. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan, 5(2), 212–224.
Kosasih, J. I., & SH, M. (2021). kausa yang halal dan kedudukan bahasa Indonesia dalam hukum perjanjian. Sinar Grafika (Bumi Aksara).
Nugroho, S. A., & SH, M. H. (2018). Hukum kepailitan di Indonesia: dalam teori dan praktik serta penerapan hukumnya. Kencana.
Saputri, E. M., Waspiah, W., & Arifin, R. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Hal Pengembang (Developer) Apartemen Dinyatakan Pailit. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 2(2), 151.
Septiyeni, H. (2020). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN AKIBAT TERJADINYA PAILIT PERUSAHAN PROPERTI. JURNAL PROJUDICE, 1(2).
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2010). Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Wibawa, D. (2020). Jurnalisme Warga Perlindungan, Pertanggungjawaban Etika dan Hukum. CV. Mimbar Pustaka.
Undang Undang Hukum Perdata khususnya Pasal 1131, Pasal 1132, Pasal 1133, dan Pasal 1134.
Undang Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, L.N.R.I. 2004, No. 131.
Undang Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas, khususnya dari Pasal - 104 Pasal 142.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sri Siti Munalar, Basuki Rekso Wibowo, Zulkarnain Sitompul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
