Legal Analysis of the Enforcement of Electronic ID Cards Valid for Life Against Credit Guarantee Institutions

Authors

  • Meri Handayani Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
  • Andito Galih Pratisto Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Rasyid Rido Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
  • Agus Dimyati Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
  • Anom Sutrisno Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i10.592

Keywords:

Legal Awareness of Credit, Guarantee Management, E-KTP

Abstract

Electronic ID cards (e-KTPs) issued since 2011 or 2012 remain valid for life, even after they expire. Electronic ID cards (e-KTPs) do not need to be renewed, as they remain valid for life even after they expire. However, in practice, some banks and financial institutions still refuse to accept lifetime ID cards as a requirement for credit. This research uses both normative and empirical juridical methods to describe the issues surrounding legal awareness regarding expired e-KTPs following the issuance of Circular Letter No. 470/296/SJ concerning Electronic ID Cards (e-KTPs) with lifetime validity. In accordance with legal studies, the approach used is problem-based. To strengthen the analysis and complement secondary data, field research will be conducted to obtain primary data. The data obtained will then be presented in descriptive and conceptual form. ACC Finance as the party providing the credit guarantee will reject the customer's credit if the completeness of the credit requirements uses an expired Electronic KTP but is valid for life for fear that the customer's citizenship is unclear and is already a company provision even though based on Law Number 24 of 2013 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration, specifically Article 64 paragraph (7) letter a, Circular of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 470/296/SJ which states that an expired Electronic KTP is still valid and does not need to be extended because the validity period of the Electronic KTP is for life. Based on the background that has been presented, there are several problems that can be identified as follows: legal analysis of the rejection of a lifetime Electronic KTP by a credit guarantee institution as a credit requirement? and What are the legal remedies for the rejection of a lifetime E-KTP as a credit requirement by a credit guarantee institution?

References

Ananda, R. H., Nugroho, D., & Wibowo, A. (2020). Digital identity and citizen surveillance: Evaluating Indonesia’s e-KTP system. Journal of Public Policy and Digital Society, 6(2), 67–78.

Arianto, B., & Suharto, E. (2017). The digitalization of population administration: Challenges and implementation of e-KTP in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 14(2), 101–110.

Arifin, A. (2019). Population mobility and the challenge of civil registration in Indonesia. Journal of Population Policy and Administration, 4(1), 22–31.

Hasanah, S., & Kurniawan, D. (2022). The effectiveness of NIK-based integration in e-government services. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 8(3), 141–153.

Hermawan, B., & Mardyanto, P. (2019). Evaluation of drainage system for inundation problems at subdistricts of Lowokwaru, Malang City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 239(1), 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/239/1/012013

Hidayat, W., & Prabowo, A. (2019). The effectiveness of e-KTP in improving the quality of public services in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 16(1), 45–54.

James, T. S., & Clark, A. (2020). Electoral integrity, voter fraud and voter ID in polling stations lessons from English local elections. In Building inclusive elections (pp. 78–97). Routledge.

Lestari, T. A., & Wirawan, G. (2018). Identification of obstacles in the implementation of population identity services. Journal of Governance Innovation, 6(2), 110–120.

Mahendra, R., & Widodo, A. P. (2023). Implementation of electronic ID card policy in Indonesia: A review of its effectiveness and challenges. Indonesian Journal of Public Administration, 9(1), 55–66.

Maulida, R., & Setiadi, M. (2023). Security implications of biometric integration in e-KTP systems. Journal of Information Security and Digital Governance, 11(1), 49–61.

Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Indonesian civil procedure law (8th ed., 1st printing). Liberty.

Prasetya, A., & Cahyani, D. (2019). Chip-based ID cards: A study of data accuracy and reliability in e-KTP. Information Systems Journal Indonesia, 7(2), 98–109.

Putra, Y. D., & Nugroho, H. (2021). The risk of identity duplication in Indonesia’s conventional population registration system. Journal of Digital Government, 5(3), 78–88.

Ramadhan, A., & Syahputra, R. (2022). e-KTP and its impact on the detection of criminal networks in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Security and Governance, 5(3), 101–113.

Saputra, T. W., Permana, H., & Lestari, D. (2021). Biometric identity systems for public administration: A review of e-KTP implementation. Asian Journal of Government and Innovation, 5(1), 23–36.

Susanti, N., & Hakim, A. (2020). E-KTP as an innovation in public administration: Enhancing transparency and identity security. Public Policy and Administration Review, 8(4), 105–115.

Suryani, R., & Azizah, L. N. (2021). Strengthening national identity through electronic ID: The Indonesian experience. Journal of Governance Studies, 9(4), 200–214.

Wardhani, T., Nugroho, Y., & Rahman, A. (2020). Enhancing digital identity security through centralized population database: Case of Indonesia’s e-KTP. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101512

Yulianto, D., & Marlina, T. (2023). The role of NIK in digital governance: e-KTP as a cornerstone of Indonesia’s integrated administrative system. Journal of Digital Public Administration, 11(1), 88–99.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-28