Climate Change Disclosure in the Indonesian Banking Industry: a Case Study Of Jtrust Bank, Shinhan Bank, and Ok Bank (2020–2024)

Authors

  • Nurkhasanah Nurkhasanah Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie, Indonesia
  • Carmel Meiden Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i12.614

Keywords:

Sustainability Report, Banking, RAAR, Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, Metrics and Targets

Abstract

Climate change has become a significant global issue and is increasingly gaining attention in the financial sector, including the banking industry. This study analyzes the level of climate change disclosure by three foreign banks in Indonesia JTrust Bank, Shinhan Bank, and OK Bank with a focus on the implementation of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework, which covers four pillars: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics and Targets. Using a content analysis method of the Adequacy and Accuracy of Reporting indexes for the 2020–2024 period, both quantitative and qualitative assessments were conducted to evaluate the consistency and depth of disclosures. The results show that JTrust Bank has the highest level of disclosure, followed by Shinhan Bank and OK Bank. These differences are influenced by internal preparedness, strategic commitment to sustainability, and the regulatory policies of their home countries. This study emphasizes the importance of integrating climate issues into banks' governance and business strategies, and it is expected to provide both academic and practical contributions to encourage climate disclosure transparency in line with international standards

Author Biographies

  • Nurkhasanah Nurkhasanah, Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie, Indonesia
    Climate change has become a significant global issue and is increasingly gaining attention in the financial sector, including the banking industry. This study analyzes the level of climate change disclosure by three foreign banks in Indonesia—JTrust Bank, Shinhan Bank, and OK Bank—with a focus on the implementation of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework, which covers four pillars: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics and Targets. Using a content analysis method with the RAAR (Rating of the Adequacy and Accuracy of Reporting) instrument for the 2020–2024 period, both quantitative and qualitative assessments were conducted to evaluate the consistency and depth of disclosures. The results show that JTrust Bank has the highest level of disclosure, followed by Shinhan Bank and OK Bank. These differences are influenced by internal preparedness, strategic commitment to sustainability, and the regulatory policies of their home countries. This study emphasizes the importance of integrating climate issues into banks’ governance and business strategies, and it is expected to provide both academic and practical contributions to encourage climate disclosure transparency in line with international standards
  • Carmel Meiden, Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie, Indonesia
    Climate change has become a significant global issue and is increasingly gaining attention in the financial sector, including the banking industry. This study analyzes the level of climate change disclosure by three foreign banks in Indonesia—JTrust Bank, Shinhan Bank, and OK Bank—with a focus on the implementation of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework, which covers four pillars: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics and Targets. Using a content analysis method with the RAAR (Rating of the Adequacy and Accuracy of Reporting) instrument for the 2020–2024 period, both quantitative and qualitative assessments were conducted to evaluate the consistency and depth of disclosures. The results show that JTrust Bank has the highest level of disclosure, followed by Shinhan Bank and OK Bank. These differences are influenced by internal preparedness, strategic commitment to sustainability, and the regulatory policies of their home countries. This study emphasizes the importance of integrating climate issues into banks’ governance and business strategies, and it is expected to provide both academic and practical contributions to encourage climate disclosure transparency in line with international standards

References

Adu, D. A., Abedin, M. Z., Saa, V. Y., & Boateng, F. (2024). Bank sustainability, climate change initiatives and financial performance: The role of corporate governance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95(PB), 103438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103438

Ameli, N., Drummond, P., Bisaro, A., Grubb, M., & Chenet, H. (2020). Climate finance and disclosure for institutional investors: why transparency is not enough. Climatic Change, 160(4), 565–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02542-2

Aryantie, M. H., Hidayat, M. Y., Widodo, T., Putra, A., & Dewata, I. (2023). Environmental Perspectives to the Rejection of Javanese Karst Mining in Systematic Literature Reviews. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(12), 3757–3764. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.181207

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi (Edisi 2). Pustaka pelajar.

Delbeke, J., Runge-Metzger, A., Slingenberg, Y., & Werksman, J. (2019). The Paris Agreement. In Towards a Climate-Neutral Europe (Issue June 2017, pp. 24–45).

Daromes, F. E., Holly, A., & Loeferdy, M. (2023). Analisis Aspek Materialitas Dalam Pelaporan Keberlanjutan. WACANA EKONOMI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi), 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22225/we.22.1.2023.1-17

Fahira, A. T., & Sebrina, N. (2024). Tingkat Materialitas Berdasarkan Kepentingan Stakeholder pada Penyajian Laporan Keberlanjutan. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi (JEA), 6(2), 728–745.

Fasan, M. (2024). Sustainability reporting from the EU perspective. Revista Catarinense Da Ciência Contábil, 23, e3466. https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-7662202434661

Feliyanti, C. (2022). Analisis Penilaian Materialitas Laporan Keberlanjutan Pada 15 Perusahaan Multifinance. Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v11i1.814

Harindahyani, S., & Agustia, D. (2023). The assurance providers’ role in improving the independent assurance statement quality on sustainability reporting. Accounting Research Journal, 36(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-01-2021-0024

Kühle, K., & Quick, R. (2024). The impact of corporate governance statement assurance on financial professionals’ decisions. Accounting in Europe, 9480, 18–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2024.2332390

Lu, J., Yu, D., Mahmoudian, F., Nazari, J. A., & Herremans, I. M. (2024). The influence of board interlocks and sustainability experience on transparent sustainability disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 3769–3793. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3678

Ovina, M. E., & Meiden, C. (2023). Kualitas Pengungkapan Emisi Karbon Pada Laporan Keberlanjutan Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Berdasarkan Indeks Sri-Kehati Periode 2018–2022. Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v13i1.1033

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017a). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 51 /POJK.03/2017 tentang Penerapan Keuangan Berkelanjutan bagi Lembaga Jasa Keuangan, Emiten, dan Perusahaan Publik.

Raar, J. (2002). Environmental initiatives: towards triple?bottom line reporting. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280210436781

Sofwatillah, Risnita, Jailani, M. S., & Saksitha, D. A. (2024). Tehnik Analisis Data Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dalam Penelitian Ilmiah. Jurnal Genta Mulia, 15(2), 79–91. https://ejournal.stkipbbm.ac.id/index.php/gm

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

TCFD. (2017). Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (Issue June).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23