Telemedicine in the Health Communication Industry: A Systematic Review and Implications for Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i12.619Keywords:
Telemedicine, E-health, Communication Industry, Healthcare Access, Health TechnologyAbstract
Technological advancements have significantly transformed the healthcare sector, with telemedicine emerging as a key innovation that integrates healthcare services with the communication industry. Telemedicine, defined as the use of electronic communication to deliver healthcare remotely, offers notable benefits such as expanded access to services, cost efficiency, and enhanced quality of care. These advantages are particularly relevant in Indonesia, where geographical challenges and uneven population distribution often limit healthcare accessibility. The COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated telemedicine adoption globally and nationally, underscoring its critical role in ensuring service continuity during health crises. This study aims to analyze the development, challenges, opportunities, and future trends of telemedicine in relation to the communication industry. Employing a systematic literature review method, the research synthesizes findings from English-language journal articles indexed in Scopus to provide an evidence-based overview of telemedicine’s trajectory. The findings reveal that while telemedicine has improved access and efficiency, its implementation in Indonesia still faces barriers such as digital infrastructure limitations, regulatory gaps, and digital literacy disparities. Opportunities exist in strengthening policy frameworks, expanding broadband access, and fostering cross-sector collaborations between healthcare and communication industries. The study contributes to both healthcare and communication fields by highlighting telemedicine as a convergence point that requires integrated governance and innovation. The implications suggest that sustainable telemedicine development will depend on addressing structural barriers while leveraging technological growth to enhance equitable healthcare delivery in Indonesia.
References
Ackerman, M. J., Howe, S. E., & Masys, D. R. (2022). Don Lindberg, high performance computing and communications, and telemedicine. Information Services & Use, 42(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-210143
Alexandra, S., Handayani, P. W., & Azzahro, F. (2021). Indonesian hospital telemedicine acceptance model: The influence of user behavior and technological dimensions. Heliyon, 7(12), e08599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08599
Arkandhi, A. J., & Harjaningsih, W. (2022). Effectiveness of telemedicine use to improve patient outcome in cancer patients: A narrative review. Pharmacy Education, 22(2), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2022.222.248253
Ayatollahi, H., Sarabi, F. Z. P., & Langarizadeh, M. (2015). Clinicians' knowledge and perception of telemedicine technology. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317090300_Clinicians%E2%80%99_Knowledge_and_Perception_of_Telemedicine_Technology
Chen, C., Wong, T., Chen, H., Huang, J., & Wang, C. (2022). Telemedicine communication using instant messaging technology improves pre-hospital triage in high mountain train disasters. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 29(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024907920966530
Choi, D. T., Sada, Y. H., Sansgiry, S., Kaplan, D. E., Taddei, T. H., Aguilar, J. K., Stayhorn, M., Hernaez, R., & Davila, J. A. (2022). Using telemedicine to facilitate patient communication and treatment decision-making following multidisciplinary tumor board review for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-022-00844-w
Coleman, C. (2020). Health literacy and clear communication best practices for telemedicine. HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice, 4(4), e215–e221. https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20200924-01
Colucci, M., Baldo, V., Baldovin, T., & Bertoncello, C. (2017). A "matter of communication": A new classification to compare and evaluate telehealth and telemedicine interventions and understand their effectiveness as a communication process. Health Informatics Journal, 25(2), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458217747109
Guo, G., Sun, G., Bin, S., & Shao, F. (2019). Design and analysis of field telemedicine information communication protocol based on wireless sensor network. IEEE Access, 7, 50630–50635. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2908932
He?man, H., Faridová, A., Tefr, O., Farid, S., Ayayee, N., Trojanová, K., Mareš, J., K?epelka, P., Haná?ek, J., Jal?vková, B., Krofta, L., & Feyereisl, J. (2022). Telemedicine in prenatal care. Central European Journal of Public Health, 30(2), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a7458
Joseph, A., Chalil Madathil, K., Jafarifiroozabadi, R., Rogers, H., Mihandoust, S., Khasawneh, A., McNeese, N., Holmstedt, C., & McElligott, J. T. (2021). Communication and teamwork during telemedicine-enabled stroke care in an ambulance. Human Factors, 64(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720821995687
Joshi, S., Manimurugan, S., Aljuhani, A., Albalawi, U., & Aljaedi, A. (2022). Energy-efficient and secure wireless communication for telemedicine in IoT. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 43(3), 1111–1130. https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2022.024802
Kanmodi, K. K., Jayasinghe, Y. A., Jayasinghe, R. D., Onuoha, S., Amzat, J., Salami, A., Nkhata, M., & Nnyanzi, L. A. (2025). The understanding of digital communication experts and oral cancer at-risk persons on oral cancer, their uptake of educational mobile health applications on oral cancer, and their opinions on how a good application of such should look like: Findings from a qualitative study. BMC Oral Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05614-1
Korai, T., Okita, K., Okuya, K., Hamabe, A., Miyo, M., Akizuki, E., Sato, Y., Ishii, M., Miura, R., Ito, T., Nobuoka, T., & Takemasa, I. (2023). Development of an ultralow-latency communication system using shared internet access: Promoting the implementation of telemedicine. Surgery Today, 53(4), 522–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-022-02602-8
Leite, H., Hodgkinson, I. R., & Gruber, T. (2020). New development: 'Healing at a distance' telemedicine and COVID-19. Public Money & Management, 40(6), 483–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1748855
Maugeri, A., Barchitta, M., Basile, G., & Agodi, A. (2024). Public and research interest in telemedicine from 2017 to 2022: Infodemiology study of Google Trends data and bibliometric analysis of scientific literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e50088. https://doi.org/10.2196/50088
Mokhaberi, N., Schoof, B., Strahl, A., Reinshagen, K., & Wintges, K. (2024). Enhancing telemedicine communication for improved outpatient pediatric trauma care. Children, 11(9), 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091120
Mulcare, M., Naik, N., Greenwald, P., Schullstrom, K., Gogia, K., Clark, S., Kang, Y., & Sharma, R. (2020). Advanced communication and examination skills in telemedicine: A structured simulation-based course for medical students. MedEdPORTAL, 16, 11047. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11047
Nguyen, A. D., White, S. J., Tse, T., Cartmill, J. A., Roger, P., Hatem, S., & Willcock, S. M. (2024). Communication during telemedicine consultations in general practice: Perspectives from general practitioners and their patients. BMC Primary Care, 25(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02576-1
Ningsih, K. P., Anshoriyah, S., Nurcahyanti, K. K. A., Handayani, T. P., & Ningrum, D. (2025). The impact of telemedicine on patient outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Public Health Excellence, 4(2), 385–389. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijphe.v4i2.1211
Paige, S. R., Bunnell, B. E., & Bylund, C. L. (2022). Disparities in patient-centered communication via telemedicine. Telemedicine and E-Health, 28(2), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0001
Rahman, F. F., Johan, H., Noorbaya, S., Khatimah, K., & Darsono, S. N. A. C. (2023). Indonesian perspectives about telemedicine: Strength of social support, access, and internet use telehealth usability amidst COVID-19. Universal Journal of Public Health, 11(6), 852–860. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujph.2023.110609
Record, J. D., Ziegelstein, R. C., Christmas, C., Rand, C. S., & Hanyok, L. A. (2021). Delivering personalized care at a distance: How telemedicine can foster getting to know the patient as a person. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020137
Rozario, D. (2018). Optimization of communication in the surgical program via instant messaging, web-based surveys, newsletters, websites, smartphones and telemedicine: The experience of Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 61(2), E27–E32. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.004418
Saeki, M., Oyama, S., Yoneda, H., Shimoda, S., Agata, T., Handa, Y., Kaneda, S., & Hirata, H. (2022). Demonstration experiment of telemedicine using ultrasonography and telerehabilitation with 5G communication system in aging and depopulated mountainous area. Digital Health, 8, 205520762211290. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221129074
Saputra, R. (2024). Telemedicine: Solutions and challenges for health workers in rural Indonesia in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 18, e122. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.122
Sholihah, M., Ardana, Z. C., & Mitake, Y. (2024). The rise of telemedicine services in Indonesia: What factors determine customers' repurchase intentions? E3S Web of Conferences, 517, 14005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451714005
Valencia-Arias, A., Gallegos, A., Aliaga Bravo, V. D. C., Victoria Mori, F. L., Uribe-Bedoya, H., & Palacios-Moya, L. (2024). Understanding telemedicine adoption: Evidence, gaps, and future perspectives for sustainable healthcare. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2306712. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2306712
Zhang, Z., Bai, E., Xu, Y., Stepanian, A., Kutzin, J. M., Adelgais, K., & Ozkaynak, M. (2024). A smart glass telemedicine application for prehospital communication: User-centered design study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e53157. https://doi.org/10.2196/53157
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Andanareswari Wardhani, Febrina Galuh Permanasari, Yolanda Natasia Letare, Niken Febrina Ernungtyas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
