Reformulation of the Prosecutor’s Office’s Regulatory Role in the Legislative Process for Sustainable Economic Development

Authors

  • I Gede Willy Pramana Universitas Udayana
  • Gde Made Swardhana Universitas Udayana
  • Desak Putu Dewi Kasih Universitas Udayana
  • Sagung Putri M.E. Purwani Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v4i6.694

Keywords:

Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, Preventive Legal Security, Sustainable Economic Development, Ambiguity of Norms, Development Policy Legislation

Abstract

The phenomenon of sustainable economic development in Indonesia reveals the increasing complexity of national strategic policies and projects, which necessitate preventive and sustainable legal safeguarding. Normatively, the Indonesian Prosecutor's Office is positioned not only as a repressive law enforcement body but also as an institution with preventive and protective functions through its law enforcement intelligence authority, as stipulated in Article 30B of Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia (the Amendment to the Prosecutor's Law). However, its implementation reveals that the Prosecutor's Office's role in the legislative process and development policy planning has not been optimally actualized. Juridically, this is due to the ambiguous norm (vague norm) in Article 34 of the Amended Prosecutor's Law, which uses the permissive phrase "may" in providing legal considerations to the President and other government agencies. This phrasing fails to establish a legal obligation for the Prosecutor's Office's involvement in the development legislation process. Sociologically, the absence of a clear regulatory model and mechanism regarding the Prosecutor's Office's security function during the early stages of policy formulation leads to weak preventive legal supervision. Consequently, this creates fertile ground for conflicts of interest, legal uncertainty, and potential abuse of authority in sustainable economic development. This research employs a normative legal research method, focusing on the ambiguity of norms, particularly the phrase "may" in Article 34 of the Amended Prosecutor's Law. This ambiguity underscores the urgent need for a regulatory framework that explicitly mandates the active role of the Prosecutor's Office in the legislative process at every level, given its unique authority in law enforcement intelligence and its mandate to provide legal considerations to the President and other government agencies.

References

Armiyati, L. (2019). Memakmurkan kembali Amerika Serikat. Deepublish Publisher.

Banulita, M. (2023). Asas penuntutan tunggal. Guepedia.

bbc.com. (2024, October 30). Korupsi tambang timah timbulkan kerugian negara Rp271 triliun - Siapa 'pemain utama' dan bagaimana dampaknya pada lingkungan? https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cq5vvjj592qo

Bougun, F. (2018). Inside the mind of Xi Jinping. Hurst and Company.

Brunet, A., & Guichard, J. P. (2020). Memaknai hagemoni Tiongkok (M. A. Djirimu, Trans.). Deepublish.

Dunn, W. N. (2003). Public policy analysis. Prentice Hall.

Effendy, M. (2005). Kejaksaan RI, posisi, dan fungsinya. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Fika, D. R. (2024, October 30). Kasus korupsi jalan tol MBZ, Kejaksaan Agung periksa eks direktur Jasa Marga dan 2 saksi lain. Tempo.co. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/kasus-korupsi-jalan-tol-mbz-kejaksaan-agung-periksa-eks-direktur-jasa-marga-dan-2-saksi-lain-1064023

Hartono, D. (2023). Ekonomi pembangunan (ketimpangan dalam pemerataan pendapatan). Yayasan Pendidikan Cendikia Muslim.

Kuncoro, M. (2018). Perencanaan pembangunan daerah. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Mahardi, D., & Taher, A. (2018). 7 pilar pembangunan bangsa. Buana Ilmu Populer.

Munandar, A. I., Dkk. (2019). Pembangunan berkelanjutan: Studi kasus di Indonesia. PT Jawa Mediasindi Lestari.

Muulila, A. P. (2022). The role of cultural heritage towards socio-economic development in Namibia: Case of Oshikoto region. University of Namibia.

Ness, I. (2023). Migration as economic imperialism: How international labour mobility undermines economic development in poor countries. John Wiley & Sons.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum progresif. Kompas.

Rohim, H. A. A. (2024, October 30). Pembangunan infrastruktur dorong pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/pembangunan_infrastruktur_dorong_pertumbuhan_ekonomi_indonesia

Sasongko, H. (1996). Penuntutan dan tehnik membuat surat dakwaan. Dharma Surya Berlian.

Seng, Z. Y. (2020). Reformasi kelembagaan dalam sistem keuangan Tiongkok (C. S. Tjhin, Trans.). Yayasan Pustaka Obor.

Sihombing, J. (2010). Peran dan aspek hukum dalam pembangunan ekonomi. PT Alumni.

Sukarniati, L., Dkk. (2021). Ekonomi pembangunan (teori dan tantangan di negara berkembang). UAD Press.

Suryono, A. (2010). Dimensi-dimensi prima teori pembangunan. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

USLegal. (2020). Dominus litis law and legal definition. https://definitions.uslegal.com/d/dominus-litis/

Utomo, N. A., & Widiati, E. P. (2016). Menjejakkan legislasi berbasis HAM. Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-28