The Ambiguity of Norms in Legal Protection for Advocates and the Problem of the Limits of Good Faith in the Criminal Justice System
DOI:
10.59888/ajosh.v4i10.737Published:
2026-07-07Downloads
Abstract
Legal protection for advocates is a fundamental prerequisite for the realization of fair trials, particularly in ensuring the independence of the defense function within the criminal justice system. The regulation of advocate immunity rights in Article 149 paragraph (2) of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code normatively guarantees that advocates cannot be prosecuted criminally or civilly in the exercise of their profession, but this protection is limited by the phrase "good faith," which has no operational definition or objective parameters. This gap creates normative ambiguity that generates tension between protection and restriction, with implications for legal uncertainty and the potential criminalization of advocates arising from disparate interpretations by law enforcement officials. This study aims to analyze the normative construction of advocate immunity, examine the conceptual problems of "good faith" as the boundary of immunity, and evaluate its implications for legal certainty and professional independence. The method employed is normative juridical research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The research findings indicate that the absence of measurable indicators for assessing "good faith" leaves room for excessive discretion and weakens the effectiveness of advocate protection. This study proposes a reconstruction of the concept of "good faith" through the formulation of an operational definition grounded in the advocacy function, the use of professional standards and codes of ethics as objective parameters, and regulatory harmonization to strengthen legal certainty within the criminal justice system.
Keywords:
Advocate Immunity Good Faith Legal Certainty Criminalization Legal ProtectionReferences
Aryani, D. P. (2025). Pelaksanaan Kode Etik Advokat Untuk Mencegah Penyalahgunaan Wewenang. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 3(01).
Saepudin, A. (2024). Kajian Terhadap Kedudukan Advokat Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Milthree Law Journal, 1(1), 1-29.
Nasution, P. R. (2025). Rekonstruksi Organisasi Advokat Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Dan Pengaruhnya Dalam Mencapai Kepastian Hukum. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 15(5), 91-100.
Sitompul, S. M. (2026). Dari Kuhap 1981 Ke Kuhap 2025: Meneguhkan Advokat Sebagai Pilar Keseimbangan Kekuasaan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Yang Modern. Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan Dan Politik Islam, 6(1), 71-96.
Nurhidayah, A. (2023). Hak Imunitas Advokat Dalam Menjalankan Profesi Hukum. Constitutum: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 2(1), 77-89.
Zebua, A. S. (2026). Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Immunitas Advokat Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 14(2), 127-140.
Prasetya, D. A. (2025). Lompatan Progresif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (Kuhap) Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Peradilan Pidana Berkeadilan: Progressive Leaps In The Criminal Procedure Code (Kuhap) As An Effort To Realize Fair Criminal Justice. Ipmhi Law Journal, 5(2), 315-352.
Sugiarto, E. S. (2025). Membedah Itikad Baik Sebagai Syarat Mutlak Imunitas Profesi Bagi Advokat Dalam Perspektif Klasifikasi Norma. Sengkuni Journal (Social Science And Humanities Studies), 6(1), 113-122.
Lubis, F. K. (2026). Kode Etik Dan Integritas Profesi Advokat: Hubungan Antara Etika, Pengawasan, Dan Pembelaan Diri Dalam Praktik Hukum. Jurnal L Pendidikan Masyrakat Indonesia Harapan,, 2026(2026).
Anisyaniawati, A. &. (2024). Konsep Hukum Dan Keadilan Dalam Pemikiran Gustav Radbruch. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 2(01).
Rinaldi, S. F. (2025). Hukum Positivisme: Analisis Pemikiran Hans Kelsen Tentang Grundnorm. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(01).
Bida, D. N. (2026). Analisis Pengaturan Hak Imunitas Advokat Dalam Menjalankan Profesinya Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 Tentang Advokat. Riggs: Journal Of Artificial Intelligence And Digital Business, 4(4), 9379-9385.
Zahara, F. F. (2023). Transparansi Advokat Sebagai Profesi Yang Terhormat (Officium Nobile). As-Syar'i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 5(3), 874-880.
Fazriah, D. N. (2022). Hubungan Kebebasan Dan Tanggung Jawab Dalam Profesi Advokat. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 1(01).
Pande, Y. N. (2024). Advocate Immunity Rights In Providing Legal Services To Clients. International Journal Of Health, Economics, And Social Sciences (Ijhess), 6(3), 828-831.
Putri, R. M. (2026). Etika Profesi Sebagai Pilar Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 4(02).
Laksono, A. S. (2026). Prinsip Due Process Of Law Dalam Pembaruan Hukum Acara Pidana Terhadap Eksistensi Praperadilan. Ensiklopedia Of Journal, 8(2).
Sinilele, A. (2020). Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Jual-Beli Tanah Menurut Kuh-Perdata. El-Iqthisady: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 59-67.
Christy, M. A. (2022). Penyimpangan Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Kendaraan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Dan Perdata. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 7(1), 1-21.
Irwandani, R. M. (2026). Pedoman Moral Hingga Instrumen Hukum: Peran Kode Etik Dalam Menjaga Profesionalisme Advokat. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 4(02).
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arih Wira Suranta, Indah Kusuma Wardhani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
