Accelerating The Readiness of The H2 Plant Unit and Maintaining the Quantity of HCU Valuable Product During Repairs to The Radiant Tube Reformer Leak Using a New Radiant Tube Reformer Plugging Method at PT Pertamina Patra Niaga Refinery Unit II Dumai
DOI:
10.59888/ajosh.v4i7.696Published:
2026-04-08Downloads
Abstract
This paper presents an operational reliability case study from the hydrogen plant that supports the hydrocracking complex at PT Kilang Pertamina Internasional Unit II Dumai. A crack was identified in radiant tube Row A No. 10 in reformer 702-H-1, creating an urgent risk of hydrogen release, tube rupture, fire escalation, and prolonged production loss. The conventional corrective action, namely full retubing with a new tube and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) restoration, required approximately 138 hours and depended on spare tube availability. To reduce downtime and avoid a multiplier effect on the hydrocracker value chain, the team developed a new plugging method that isolated the failed radiant tube by installing welded plugs at both the outlet and inlet sides instead of replacing the entire tube. An engineering design package was prepared using 3D modeling, stress analysis, material selection for SS 310 and HK40 components, and load verification at the design pressure of 20.5 kg/cm². The implemented method restored operation faster than the historical retubing route, achieving a repair duration of approximately 40 hours versus 138 hours for the previous method. Operational impacts reported by the plant included normal H? plant operation above 30k Nm³/h, preserved jet fuel quality, medium-risk work exposure instead of high-risk exposure, avoided costs of approximately IDR 244.8 million, and protection of HCU profit equivalent to around IDR 10 billion. The case demonstrates that a fit-for-purpose plugging strategy can be an effective emergency repair option for radiant tube failures when supported by engineering verification, fabrication control, and formal standardizationKeywords:
hydrogen plant radiant tube reformer emergency repair plugging method downtime reductionReferences
PT Pertamina Patra Niaga Refinery Unit II Dumai. PCP Nusantara 2.0 presentation materials.
PT Pertamina Patra Niaga Refinery Unit II Dumai. PCP Nusantara 2.0 movie storyboard
Ray, A.K., Sinha, S.K., Tiwari, Y.N., Swaminathan, J., Das, G., Chaudhuri, S., and Singh, R. (2003). Analysis of failed reformer tubes. Engineering Failure Analysis, 10(3), 351–362.
Bonaccorsi, L., Guglielmino, E., Pino, R., Servetto, C., and Sili, A. (2014). Damage analysis in Fe–Cr–Ni centrifugally cast alloy tubes for reforming furnaces. Engineering Failure Analysis, 36, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.09.020
Bahrami, A. and Taheri, P. (2019). Creep failure of reformer tubes in a petrochemical plant. Metals, 9(10), 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9101026
Dobrotvorskaia, A.N., Dobrotvorskii, M.A., Shevyakova, E.P., and Simanov, M.A. (2022). Failure cause assessment of steam reformer radiant tube after long-term service. Materials and Corrosion. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.202213068
Fuyang, C., Zhou, Y., Shao, B., Zhang, T., Guo, X., Gong, J., and Wang, X. (2021). Weldability and damage evaluations of fresh-to-aged reformer furnace tubes. Metals, 11(6), 900. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11060900
Fuyang, C., Zhu, L., Gong, J., and Wang, X. (2020). Feasibility assessment of local repairment for reformer furnace tubes in service exposure. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 181, 104032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.104032
American Petroleum Institute (API). API Standard 560: Fired Heaters for General Refinery Service. 5th ed. Washington, DC: API; 2016.
American Petroleum Institute (API). API Standard 530: Calculation of Heater-Tube Thickness in Petroleum Refineries. 7th ed. Washington, DC: API; 2015.
American Petroleum Institute (API). API Recommended Practice 573: Inspection of Fired Boilers and Heaters. 5th ed. Washington, DC: API; 2023.
API/ASME Joint Committee. API 579-1/ASME FFS-1: Fitness-For-Service. Washington, DC / New York, NY: API and ASME.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II, Part D: Properties. New York, NY: ASME.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section IX: Welding, Brazing, and Fusing Qualifications. New York, NY: ASME.
Larson, F.R. and Miller, J. (1952). A time-temperature relationship for rupture and creep stresses. Transactions of the ASME, 74, 765–771.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indra Harapan Situmorang, Akbar Putra Jhonem, Rudi Hermawan, Edward Cantona Taufan, Zulfajri Zulfajri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
