Reconstruction of The Definition of An Advocate in The Criminal Justice System based on Certain Qualification Standards
DOI:
10.59888/ajosh.v4i9.724Published:
2026-06-17Downloads
Abstract
Amendments to the regulations in Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code raise fundamental issues regarding the definition of an advocate, particularly as formulated in Article 1, number 22, which expands the scope of legal service providers beyond professional advocates. This expansion creates a dualism between advocates, who are a profession with specific qualification standards, and non-professionals who are allowed to provide legal services. This situation creates disharmony with Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates. It has implications for legal uncertainty, degradation of professionalism, and the potential weakening of the protection of suspects' rights in the criminal justice system. This study aims to analyze the normative weaknesses in the definition of an advocate and to formulate a legal reconstruction that guarantees the certainty of qualification standards. The method used is a normative juridical approach, with statutory and conceptual analysis, as well as qualitative analysis through legal interpretation. The research findings indicate that expanding the definition of an advocate without clear qualifications risks obscuring the legitimacy of the advocacy profession as an officium nobile and weakening its function as a counterweight to state power. Legal reconstruction is needed through reaffirming advocacy as a qualification-based profession, strictly separating it from non-advocate legal aid providers, and harmonizing the provisions in the New Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) with the Advocates Law. This approach is expected to maintain a balance between access to legal aid and ensuring the quality of defense, thereby realizing a just and integrity-based criminal justice system.
Keywords:
advocate New Criminal Procedure Code legal certainty professionalism legal aidReferences
Adam, Angelika Permata, Ibrahim, Arif Mahfudin, Aruan, Tri Mega Putri, Tolingguhu, Nazwa, Al’Asfah, Reza, Palahuwata, Tri Meutia Nur Auliya, Labaka, Arini, & Maini, Hilal Perdana. (2026). Penerapan asas due process of law dalam hukum acara pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis (J-KUMBIS), 4(1), 16–27.
Alfayum, A. &. (2025). Hubungan Profesi Dan Profesional Hukum Dalam Menjaga Integritas. JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA, 2(3), 728-738.
Anan, M. S. (2025). Extrajudicial Killing Oleh Aparat Penegak Hukum Sebagai Pelanggaran Prinsip Due Process Of Law Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 8(1), 374-382.
Anjani, M. T. (2025). Pentingnya pendidikan berkelanjutan bagi advokat dalam menghadapi perubahan peraturan. Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU, 2(1), 99-106.
Butar-butar, B. N. (2026). Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Melalui Peran Advokat. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial, 4(4), 609-620.
Endira, B. K. (2022). Kedudukan dan peran organisasi profesi advokat terhadap advokat yang berhadapan dengan hukum. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1), 389-400.
Farid, A. M. (2023). Eksistensi Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Dan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat. Strata Social and Humanities Studies, 1(1), 10-18.
Herman, K. M. (2025). Penguatan Kewenangan Advokat Dalam Penegakan Hukum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003. Jurnal Retentum, 5(2), 463-474.
Kinanty, D. P. (2023). Peranan Advokat Dalam Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu Berdasarkan UU No 16 Tahun 2011 Tentang Bantuan Hukum. As-Syar'i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 5(2), 451-461.
Laksono, A. S. (2021). Eksistensi Advokat Sebagai Penegak Hukum Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Ditinjau Dari Pasal 56 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 5(1), 88-102.
Lubis, F. K. (2026). Kode Etik dan Integritas Profesi Advokat: Hubungan antara Etika, Pengawasan, dan Pembelaan Diri dalam Praktik Hukum. Jurnal Kesehatan dan Kebidanan Masyarakat Harapan, 2026(2026), 1-11.
Lubis, F. P. (2025). Implementasi dan tantangan kode etik profesi advokat dalam mewujudkan etika profesi yang berintegritas. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(01), 263-274.
Luthfi, M. I. (2026). Hak Dan Kewajiban Advokat. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(1), 2117-2124.
Rangkuti, L. H. (2024). Nilai keadilan sebagai landasan pembentukan Undang-Undang Bantuan Hukum guna mewujudkan akses terhadap keadilan. Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues, 3(1), 1-11.
Saepudin, A. (2024). Kajian Terhadap Kedudukan Advokat Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Milthree Law Journal, 1(1), 1-29.
Saraswati, P. S. (2025). Perlindungan Hak Tersangka Dan Terdakwa: Penegakan Prinsip Fair Trial dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS), 7(02), 1035-1044.
Sasra, A. D. (2025). Peranan Advokat sebagai Pemberi Bantuan Hukum dalam Menentukan Strategi Penyelesaian Perkara. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(1).
Sitorus, H. M. (2024). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Prinsip Kejelasan dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Studi Kasus Uu No. 12 Tahun 2011. Civics Education and Social Science Journal (CESSJ), 6(2), 231-242.
Wijaya, W. A. (2025). PERAN PENDAMPINGAN ADVOKAT DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HAK TERSANGKA PADA PROSES PENYIDIKAN. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3(11).
Zahara, F. F. (2023). Transparansi Advokat Sebagai Profesi Yang Terhormat (Officium Nobile). As-Syar'i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 5(3), 874-880.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hamka Ferynando, Natsir Asnawi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
