Management of Demonstrations by Local Governments and Relevant Authorities: An Analysis of Their Roles and Impact on Public Order and the Protection of the Community
DOI:
10.59888/ajosh.v4i11.772Published:
2026-08-13Downloads
Abstract
Demonstrations as a form of public participation in local democracy often face tensions with authorities, particularly when communication and conflict management mechanisms are ineffective. The demonstration at the Central Java Governor's Office in Semarang on August 29, 2025, which began peacefully but escalated into mass riots causing substantial damage and public disruption, highlights the urgent need to evaluate how local governments and relevant authorities manage demonstrations and their implications for public order and community protection. This research analyzes the role of local governments and relevant authorities in managing demonstrations, as well as their implications for public order and community protection. The study used a qualitative approach with narrative-descriptive analysis of interviews with 20 respondents (10 officers and 10 demonstrators) and linked them to a conflict governance lens. The data show that initially peaceful demonstrations turned into mass riots due to the motive of demands for justice for victims of violence by officers and rejection of government policies deemed not in favor of the people. The security approach of officers was predominantly repressive, while the Public Order Agency (Satpol PP) played an administrative role. There was a sharp contrast in perception between officers who considered security measures in accordance with SOPs and demonstrators who considered the actions arrogant and traumatic. Conflict governance is still oriented solely towards maintaining order, thus recommending a transformation to a dialogue policing model, the implementation of the Elaborated Social Identity Model, multi-agency coordination, digital narrative monitoring, and human rights-based post-action evaluation.
Keywords:
conflict management demonstration de-escalation dialogue policing institutional coordination human rightsReferences
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Tata Kelola Publik sebagai Kolaborasi. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765381
Ayanian, A.H., Adra, A., Zeineddine, F.B., Saab, R., Vollhardt, J.R., & Tausch, N. (2025). Aksi Kolektif di Bawah Kondisi Represif: Integrasi Penelitian, Rekomendasi, dan Refleksi Tingkat Individu, Kelompok, dan Struktural. Tinjauan Isu Sosial dan Kebijakan, 19 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.70000
Barber, M., & Tankebe, J. (2024). Melacak keadilan prosedural dalam pertemuan pejalan kaki dengan penghentian dan penggeledahan menggunakan rekaman kamera tubuh polisi. Kepolisian: Jurnal Kebijakan dan Praktik, 18. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae074
Boateng, FD, & Darko, IN (2021). Legitimasi polisi yang dirasakan di Ghana: Peran keadilan prosedural dan kontak dengan polisi. Jurnal Internasional Hukum, Kejahatan dan Keadilan, 65, 100458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100458
Busher, J., Ebner, J., Hacsek, Z., Harris, G., & Macklin, G. (2025). Dinamika Relasional Eskalasi dan Inhibisi Kekerasan Selama Gelombang Protes Sayap Kanan. Ilmuwan Perilaku Amerika. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642251377875
Earl, J., Maher, T.V., & Pan, J. (2022). Represi digital terhadap gerakan sosial, protes, dan aktivisme: Tinjauan sintetis. Kemajuan Sains, 8 (10). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl8198
Nurmayanti. (2025, 2 September). Kerugian Akibat Demonstrasi Diprediksi Mencapai Rp 900 Miliar. https://Www.Liputan6.Com/Bisnis/Read/6148794/Nilai-Kerugian-Imbas-Demo-Diprediksi-Tembus-Rp-900-Miliar. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/09/05/kerugian-infrastruktur-akibat-demo-akhir-agustus-2025-hampir-rp900-miliar
Kwon, E. (2025). Manuver nuklir Korea Utara: Paksaan, pencegahan, dan paradoks eskalasi-de-eskalasi. Asian Politics & Policy, 17 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.70006
Maguire, E.R., Adams, E., & Harry, C. (2025). Pentingnya Mendengarkan dalam Dialog Polisi-Masyarakat: Wawasan dari Inisiatif Hati dan Pikiran di Trinidad dan Tobago. Police Quarterly, 28 (2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111241269985
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Legitimasi dalam Kepolisian: Tinjauan Sistematis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2013.1
McLean, K., Bussey, T., Nix, J., Rojek, J., & Alpert, G. P. (2026). Pelatihan de-eskalasi kepolisian dan pengaruhnya terhadap komunikasi: Bukti dari evaluasi eksperimental. Jurnal Peradilan Pidana, 102, 102598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2026.102598
Morgan, M., & Harfield, C. (2025). “Bicaralah dengan Mereka dan Ajak Mereka Berjalan”: Eksplorasi Pelatihan Negosiator Polisi untuk Meredakan Situasi Krisis. Jurnal Internasional untuk Kejahatan, Keadilan, dan Demokrasi Sosial. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.3960
Nägel, C., & Nivette, A. (2021). Kepolisian Protes dan Persepsi Publik terhadap Polisi: Bukti dari Eksperimen Alami di Jerman. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/h2aqz
Senjaya, IC (2025a, Agustus). Massa Membakar Beberapa Mobil di Kantor Gubernur Jawa Tengah. Antara News. https://jateng.antaranews.com/berita/597633/massa-bakar-sejumlah-mobil-di-kantor-gubernur-jateng
Laeis, Z. (2025b, September). Pemerintah Kota Semarang Belum Melakukan Inventarisasi Kerugian Pasca-Demonstrasi. Antara Jateng. https://jateng.antaranews.com/berita/598053/pemkot-semarang-belum-inventarisasi-kerugian-kerusakan-akibat-aksi-massa
Onursal, D. (2025). Pengunjuk Rasa Emosional: Berunjuk Rasa karena Marah atau Tinggal di Rumah karena Takut? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481251395311
Rocchetti, D., & Pilati, K. (2025). Dinamika Protes dan Kontraprotes di Sekitar Politik Sayap Kanan. American Behavioral Scientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642251377872
Hariyanto, M. (2025, Agustus). Kondisi Terkini Demonstrasi Kerusuhan di Semarang: Massa Membakar 4 Mobil, 3 Sepeda Motor, dan Sebuah Kios. Radar Semarang. https://radarsemarang.jawapos.com/semarang/726503089/syarat-terkini-ricuh-demo-di-semarang-massa-bakar-4-mobil-3-motor-dan-warung
Stott, C., Hassan, S., Mabry, D., Dyer, S., & Straub, K. (2026). Model Columbus: psikologi massa, kepolisian dialogis, dan manajemen protes di AS. Kepolisian dan Masyarakat, 36 (2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2025.2532546
PBB. (2020). Panduan tentang Senjata Kurang Mematikan dalam Penegakan Hukum.
Vitale, AS (2017). Akhir dari Kepolisian. Verso.
Wozni ak, J. S. G., & Conti, N. (2025). Karena Warna Kulitku: Mengatasi Rasisme Struktural dengan Calon Polisi dan Warga yang Kembali dari Penjara. Ras dan Keadilan. https://doi.org/10.1177/21533687241309334
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Annisa Pia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
