A Legal Analysis of the United States' Unilateral Import Tariff Policy on Indonesia's Trade Relations from the Perspective of International Trade Law
DOI:
10.59888/ajosh.v4i11.762Published:
2026-08-07Downloads
Abstract
The global trading system has increasingly faced challenges arising from unilateral tariff measures adopted by major economies, creating tensions between national trade interests and obligations under international trade law. The United States' reciprocal import tariff policy, which initially imposed a 32% tariff on Indonesian products, raised legal concerns regarding its consistency with the principles of non-discrimination, Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) treatment, and tariff-binding commitments under the World Trade Organization (WTO) framework and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994. This study aimed to analyze the legal implications of the United States' unilateral import tariff policy toward Indonesia and to examine Indonesia's legal and strategic responses to protecting its export interests. This research employed a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The analysis was based on primary legal materials, including the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994, WTO agreements, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, official government documents, and relevant legal decisions, supported by secondary literature and illustrative data from export-sector stakeholders. The findings indicated that the unilateral tariff policy could conflict with Articles I and II of the GATT 1994 if the differential treatment and additional tariffs were not justified under applicable WTO exceptions. The study also found that Indonesia's diplomatic response through the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade reduced tariff pressures but required careful evaluation regarding its regulatory commitments and implications for national policy interests. This research concluded that Indonesia needed a comprehensive strategy combining WTO dispute settlement mechanisms, bilateral diplomacy, export diversification, and strengthened domestic competitiveness to safeguard its national trade interests within the rules-based international trading system.
Keywords:
unilateral import tariff WTO/GATT Most-Favoured-Nation tariff obligations Indonesia fundamental change of circumstancesReferences
Ajija, S. R., Zakia, A. F., & Purwono, R. (2021). The impact of opening the export promotion agencies on Indonesia's non-oil and gas exports. Heliyon, 7(8), Article e07756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07756
Amiti, M., Redding, S. J., & Weinstein, D. E. (2019). The impact of the 2018 tariffs on prices and welfare. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 187–210.
Ardiansyah, A., Samad, R. P., & Sutiyono, R. (2025). The paradox of the rebus sic stantibus principle: The dialectic between stability and flexibility in contemporary international treaty law. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.494
Azzahra, M. J., & Dewi, Y. K. (2022). Re-examining Indonesia's nickel export ban: Does it violate the prohibition to quantitative restriction? Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, 6(2).
Crivelli, P. (2016). Regionalism and falling external protection in high and low tariff members. Journal of International Economics, 102, 70–84.
Crivelli, P., & Pinchis-Paulsen, M. (2021). Separating the political from the economic: The Russia–Traffic in Transit panel report. World Trade Review, 20(4), 582–605.
Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2020). The return to protectionism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), 1–55.
Fajgelbaum, P. D., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2022). The economic impacts of the US–China trade war. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051420-110410
Fetzer, T., & Schwarz, C. (2021). Tariffs and politics: Evidence from Trump's trade wars. The Economic Journal, 131(636), 1717–1741.
Hameed, M., Sutrisno, N., & Duffy, F. A. (2025). The Appellate Body crisis: Challenges and reforms to the World Trade Organization dispute settlement mechanism. Prophetic Law Review, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss1.art1
Ma, H., Ning, J., & Xu, M. J. (2021). An eye for an eye? The trade and price effects of China's retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports. China Economic Review, 69, Article 101685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101685
Mao, H., & Görg, H. (2020). Friends like this: The impact of the US–China trade war on global value chains. The World Economy, 43(7), 1776–1791. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12967
Mariah, Ketua Ekspor (PT Seyang Activewear), Wawancara Pribadi, Arjawinangun: 4 Desember 2025.
Pratama, D. B. (2024). The analysis of World Trade Organization panel decision of Indonesia measures relating to raw materials. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 3(3), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v3i3.121
Shimizu, K. (2021). The ASEAN Economic Community and the RCEP in the world economy. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 10(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2021.1907881
Simbolon, P. G. M., & Damayanti, A. (2023). Indonesian trade policy in adjusting the 2020 WTO's Trade Policy Review. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 12(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v12i1.18038
Suwanprasert, W. (2020). The role of the most favored nation principle of the GATT/WTO in the New Trade model. Review of International Economics, 28(3), 760–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12470
Ukpe, A., & Khorana, S. (2021). Special and differential treatment in the WTO: Framing differential treatment to achieve (real) development. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 20(2), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-08-2020-0052
Wang, C. (2019). Invocation of national security exceptions under GATT Article XXI: Jurisdiction to review and standard of review. Chinese Journal of International Law, 18(3), 695–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmz029
Wu, J., Wood, J., Oh, K., & Jang, H. (2021). Globally chained economies, unwitting victims of the US-China trade war. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 35(2), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12334
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fani Zahara Suwarno Putri, Ratu Mawar Kartina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
